Media Madness
For Christmas, I got enough books to start a library. And with the
near-Arctic weather we’ve had for January and February, I’ve had
plenty of time to read. So far, I’ve devoured the hilarious and
thoughtful The Funny Thing Is… by Ellen DeGeneres; Running With
Scissors, a most unusual memoir by author Augusten Burroughs; and I’m
halfway through Pat Conroy’s The Water Is Wide, detailing his
experiences as a teacher on a secluded, backward island off the coast of
the Carolinas. I also fell in love with Al Franken, happily devouring
two of his brilliant books, Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot and Lies
and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. Al Franken for President, indeed.
One section in Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them has
reverberated in my head frequently as of late. In this particular
chapter, Al Franken exposes the myth of our so-called "liberal
media." Most conservatives (almost always anti-gay, by the way)
love to purport that our media leans further left than the famed Tower
of Pisa. Al Franken dispels this assertion with a lot of facts, a few
figures, and more than a handful of hysterical anecdotes. The truth is,
as Franken asserts, that the media does not have a liberal bias—rather,
it simply does not report things with the right-wing slant and moral
judgments conservatives would like to hear. If anything, Franken proves,
the American media has a slightly conservative slant. In a perfect
world, of course, the media should place no slant or bias on its news
stories. The job of any newscaster worth his or her weight in peanuts is
to report exactly what has happened, not to comment on it, but I do
agree that our media has a slightly conservative bias.
My main issue with the media is not how they cover the news, but what
they cover. I’ve hated the local news shows ever since I can remember,
with their sappy feel-good
local-man-finds-missing-dentures-and-returns-them-to-grateful-grandpa
stories. I don’t need to know about the state of pothole repair on
Main Street or the tragic tale of an entire block of houses losing power
for two hours because someone crashed into an electric pole. Call me a
cultural snob, but I want to focus on the bigger issues—why our
soldiers are dying (one per day) in a country that posed absolutely no
threat to us; where the Democratic Presidential hopefuls stand on the
major issues; and how President Bush has single-handedly ruined the best
economy in the history of the world. (Now there’s a liberal slant for
you.) As a tribute to our slightly-to-the-right media, I’d like to
offer my views on three of the biggest news stories of late.
Two people in the news have become such a huge media phenomenon that,
in order to save precious airtime, their names had to be combined:
BENNIFER. In my head, the name conjures horrifying images of a
two-headed, gargantuan, though Hollywood-chic monster gobbling up every
wedding planner in this great land. If Entertainment Tonight and E! were
the only media to cover this "story" nonstop, I could accept
that. That’s show business. However, when the on-again/off-again
engagement status of a poor actor and an even less-talented
singer/dancer/actress makes the headlines of major national papers and
newscasts, I get a sinking feeling in my stomach about the sad state of
our culture.
TODAY’S HEADLINE: JENNIFER TELLS BEN IT’S OVER.
BY THE WAY: Children are being kidnapped; the AIDS epidemic is eating
Africa alive; genocide is the rule of the land in parts of the world,
the American deficit is out of control, and gay people still can’t get
married.
Nothing gets my vote for Most Ridiculous Media Coverage like our
musical stars. When Madonna kissed Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera
during their performance at the 2003 MTV Video Music Awards, the
subsequent shock waves were off the Richter Scale. Madonna’s and
Britney’s kiss was dubbed "The Kiss Heard ‘Round the
World," suggesting that the second-long smooches were just as
important as the start of the Revolutionary War. And we wonder why our
children think MTV is better than the History Channel. As a sidenote,
perhaps the kiss would not have been so shocking if we allowed
"real lesbians" the opportunity to show loving affection on
TV, instead of hailing two straight women locking lips awkwardly in a
publicity stunt.
Speaking of music scandals, I truly am sorry, Mrs. Jackson. The
matriarch of the musical Jackson tribe must sometimes wish she had told
her husband to beat it before they had children and had to endure
endless scandals from her nasty boys and girls. My boyfriend teases me
about being a Michael Jackson fan, but I am not. I simply think that he
deserves—just like every other American—to be tried in a court of
law, not in the court of public opinion. I don’t know if he’s
guilty, and unless I’m serving on his jury, it’s not up to me to
decide. And of course, the media will not let us forget about Janet
Jackson’s unexpected exposure at the Super Bowl halftime show. I’m
considering reworking a Shakespearean classic to memorialize the scandal—Much
Ado About a Breast. 51% of the world’s population has a pair of
breasts, most of the remaining 49% are often staring at them, and many
of us suckled at them at one point. It’s just a breast. Get over it. I
don’t really care if it was intended, and I don’t want millions of
dollars of the tax payers’ money pouring into the FCC so those boobs
can investigate Janet’s boob. Besides, stars wouldn’t expose
themselves and suck face on stage if the media didn’t hype it so much,
but that’s how they make a buck.
The day before I wrote this column, the Massachusetts Supreme Court,
relying on decades of American history showing that "separate but
equal" just doesn’t work, mandated the State Legislature to
institute gay marriage, not simply civil unions. Media coverage of this
decision is still unfolding, but already, I’ve read a lot more
statements from people opposing the decision than from those who support
it. I think Al Franken would agree with me—where’s the liberal media
now? Gay people usually get the short end of the stick in media
coverage. Just look at the sitcom characters that represent us on
television, and the LGBT pride rallies where the only camera shots show
an eight-foot tall drag queen or two scantily clad men exchanging
saliva. In the end, I don’t think our media is extremely liberal or
conservative.
I just think it’s largely inane.