My spouse and I
believe in doing the right thing no matter what the cost—and there is
great cost in being openly gay and actively working for equality.
Specifically, my parents disinherited me when I “came out” to them and
most of my family spurn me. I was fired from my professional position
after I reported homophobic treatment of myself as well as sexual
harassment of women. My life has been threatened twice. My spouse and I
are often verbally harassed and have received hate mail and hate phone
calls. Every day we are consciously aware that our lives and well-being
are endangered—but must live honest, principled lives despite the
threat.
Now we are asking our
state senators to have the moral courage to ensure that HB 99 becomes law
this legislative session. Whatever the political cost, at least no
senator’s life would be endangered, which is what we face daily. And
instead of allowing a hateful status quo to be perpetuated, the senators
can choose to be on the right side of history in making Delaware a more
equitable place to live.
The senators, in
short, have a chance to become heroes.
Douglas
Marshall-Steele
With all of the
attention being drawn to the concerns of LGBT foster and adoptive parents
(thanks, Rosie!), I wanted to bring the issue a little closer to home for
those of us who reside in Delaware.
I am an openly queer
foster parent to a young teenager placed with me last summer by
Delaware’s Division of Family Services, and I hope to adopt my daughter
later this year. I want to tell persons in Sussex county who might
consider becoming a foster parent or adopting an older or special-needs
child that the state agencies’ policies and personnel have been 110%
supportive of me as a queer parent through every step of the process. I
have not had even one single tiny incident of my sexuality being an issue,
and I have felt supported and respected in every way. They have even been
helpful and supportive to me and my new partner, who I met shortly after
my daughter came to live with me, as we work through the process of
becoming a blended family.
When I first decided
to become a foster parent I had no role models or mentors in the area, no
one to clue me in as to what to expect from “the system” in this
county, and I will admit that I definitely presumed some measure of close
mindedness, discomfort, or outright discrimination because of my
sexuality. I am thrilled beyond measure to report that I was totally and
completely wrong to assume that.
I am writing with
hope that this information might push others who have considered becoming
foster parents but were unsure what to expect towards making that
commitment. It has unquestionably changed my life in a dramatically
positive way, and there are far too many kids out there who need stable,
loving families. You definitely don’t need to own a home or have a
partner or have any experience as a parent in order to do this. You just
need the strong desire to make a dramatically positive difference in the
life of a child.
If you are
considering becoming a foster parent and would like to talk to someone
who’s been there, please contact me at instamom2teen@mchsi.com.
Leslie Vincent
In the March 8, 2002
edition of Letters there appears an advertisement on page 19 which I find
both disturbing and offensive. How do you justify publishing this
insensitive and tasteless ad?
This week America
viewed the moving tribute to the New York firemen by the two French film
makers. We came to realize more fully the sacrifice and dedication these
men exemplified in the enormous tragedy of the twin towers. In the
September 24 issue of Newsweek the cover photograph depicts three firemen
raising the American flag. I believe the creator of the advertisement in
question used this photo as inspiration for this questionable picture. Why
would you choose to publish something that would trivialize and diminish
their courageous efforts?
Surely bad taste and
bad judgment were involved. The American people are still in the process
of healing and do not condone this parody. This kind of irresponsibility
does not reflect your mission nor does it serve your publication well.
I trust you will
accept this criticism in the spirit in which it was written.
Mary B. Craig
I told my Realtor
that I didn’t even want to look in Dewey Beach. Too much noise, too much
booze. Not good for property values. Not a place I want to retire to. But
he insisted that I had to see this house, so to amuse him I did. What a
house! What spectacular bay views! I had to have it!
And I do. So now it
seems that I should see what can be done to fix the problems that made me
try so hard to reject Dewey. And who wouldn’t want to clean it up?
Some citizens of
Dewey Beach don’t seem to want to fix anything. I have received three
unnamed mailings against any new taxes or revenue streams. Their letters
are full of mean, unsubstantiated claims that the leadership of Dewey
Beach is incompetent, maybe criminal. You are left to read between the
lines of their insinuation.
Without new sources
of income Dewey Beach will be left in the dust while other beach
communities pass us by. Let’s be frank: much of Dewey Beach is a
“tear-down.” We need to clean up the noise, the booze and the
overcrowding in order to attract new visitors and new business. We need to
address the serious parking problem and the poor condition of our streets.
We need some attractive parks and streetscapes. We need to “postcard it
up” a little bit. This takes money.
This is not the time
to circle the wagons against the infidels. If we choose against new
revenue streams, if we turn our backs on the future, we have met the
infidels, and they are us.
Gene SirLouis, Dewey
Beach