Lowdown on the "Down-low," and Other
Tales of Treachery
It is truly time that some African-American males get a grip. Ever
since the birth of the gay liberation movement in the late 1960s, gay
black men have been much slower to come out of the closet than their while
counterparts. And, for decades, the reluctance of black men to identify
themselves as gay has been forgiven because it was so difficult for them
to deal with racism, without having to cope with homophobia as well.
But this is the 21st century, and the old excuses grow weaker with each
passing year. Now, it’s just plain aggravating to read of the rising
popularity of parties for men on the "down-low." For any of you
who haven’t heard the term, the down-low crowd refers to
African-American males who enjoy having sex—often unprotected and
usually in group situations—with other guys, but who vehemently deny
that they are gay or bisexual. In many cases, these men also have wives or
girlfriends who aren’t let in on their clandestine activities. Writer E.
Lynn Harris has covered the subject in several books, and a musical
adaptation of Harris’ story "Not A Day Goes By" continues to
spotlight the controversy—which is more than a simple question of
deceiving one’s self, one’s partner and the public.
As with any anonymous sex, the real problem with fooling around on the
down-low is the potential for spreading sexually transmitted diseases,
including HIV. A recent report on Black Entertainment Television quotes
studies "suggesting that some 30 percent of all African-American
bisexual males have the HIV infection—and 90 percent of that number do
not know they are infected."
If those figures are even close to the truth, they present a stunning
indictment of the down-low crowd, many of whose participants are highly
educated professional people, athletes and entertainers. These are men who
have overcome a lot to achieve affluence and stature in society, but who
still are fearful of telling themselves the truth.
Then there’s the matter of the women in their lives, who too often
seem to be suffering the consequences of the men’s behavior. According
to BET reporter Kweli Wright, "Government studies of 29 states show
that an African- American woman is 23 times more likely to be infected
with AIDS than a white woman. In addition, black women accounted for 71.8
percent of new HIV cases in women from 1999 to 2002. While the recent
number of infections has stabilized, the incidence of picking up the
disease through heterosexual sex has increased."
Whether we’re black, white, Hispanic or Asian, and whether we’re
gay, straight or bisexual, it’s way past time to stop lying to our
partners—and ourselves—about the nature and number of our sexual
encounters. And for those who insist on playing games in a crowded closet,
you had better grab some protection and then get real! Remember, you are
what you do.
Speaking of hypocrisy, did you read of the guesthouse in Key West that
recently was accused of throwing out several guests for being
heterosexual? The evicted couples, vacationing with gay friends,
complained that the they had already settled into their rooms when the inn’s
manager informed them they would have to leave, citing a policy of not
allowing heterosexuals on the property. According to one of the guests,
the manager "said he had to appeal to the majority, and the majority
of guests wouldn’t want straight people there."
If there’s one thing that all Americans—gay people in particular—need
to realize it’s the importance of protecting the rights of the minority,
even when affording such protection is at odds with the will of the
majority.
Key West, of course, has a strong law in place to protect everyone from
housing discrimination—even heterosexuals. However, in another Florida
town, Manalapan, everybody seems at risk of losing their right to privacy.
Manalapan is installing cameras and computers to run background checks on
every car and driver that passes through the wealthy residential community
of 320 residents near West Palm Beach.
Police Chief Clay Walker told the Associated Press that cameras will
take infrared photographs to record a car’s license tag number. Then the
commuters’ software will automatically run the tags through
law-enforcement databases. Police will be dispatched if a car or its owner
is the subject of a "be on the lookout" warning. What’s
perhaps even more frightening is that a second camera will take a picture
of the driver, and the computer will comb records to learn more about
exactly who is moving through town on a given day or night.
As the technology improves, the local gendarmes undoubtedly will be
able to peer even closer into the cars of local drivers, determining
whether they wear boxers or "tightie-whities," and whether those
Gucci handbags are knockoffs or genuine.
With a tip of the hat to John Ashcroft, social progress marches on. And
2004 seems more like 1984 every day.
Bill Sievert may be reached at