I had no trouble finding a topic for this column.
Between news of Canadian gay marriage, Delaware’s HB 99 passing the
House (but not yet the Senate), the Supremes recent sodomy ruling, the
fulminating dissent from Justice Scalia, talk of a Constitutional Amendment
against gay marriage, and would-be presidential candidates hawking their
views on same-sex unions, we’re in a great big fat snowball rolling
downhill.
Will the avalanche end quickly with bright sunny weather and wedding
receptions, or will we need an army of brandy-carrying St. Bernards to dig
us out and comfort us?
It’s hard to tell. But Americans, from high schoolers in gay-straight
alliances to grown-ups in urban, suburban and even rural families, are way
ahead of our legislators when it comes to acceptance of non-traditional
unions and family units.
Of course, prejudice and hate still abound, as evidenced by a spate of
recent letters in local papers from Delaware’s faithful. And I cringe at
those conservative talking heads commenting with pinched faces about Canada’s
horrid new law and the Supreme Court’s dastardly sodomy ruling. While I
realize that the media is committed to providing balanced coverage, I wish
they’d check out the credentials of some of the pontificating people they
interview. Some of the better-known, so-called experts with anti-gay views
have serious, well-documented credibility issues. I challenge the media to
go forth and uncover that story.
And there’s no doubt that with the 2004 presidential election looming,
the hate speech and anti-gay backlash is going to be loud, ugly and worse
before it gets better. And, of course, the level of actual prejudice may
never get better.
Still, fears about the coming collapse of the institution of marriage
strike me as more difficult to espouse these days. More and more people and
politicians (not that the two are mutually exclusive) are discovering gay
people in their very own address books, if not at the family dinner table.
We used to know we were everywhere, but straight people are beginning to
find that out too.
To reduce things to their most simplistic, folks are beginning to
understand that the gay people seeking equality are not just a bunch of
feather or leather-covered parade participants— although I have known
quite a courageous few. They are not simply a throng of pleasure-seeking
party-goers, boogeying ‘til dawn—although there was a dazzling swarm at
the Convention Center this past weekend.
Truth is, gay couples are the neighbors who are fighting about who
empties the dishwasher and who has to call Comcast. My own radical agenda
includes working, then shopping for milk, Charmin and bagels, feeding the
dogs and pinching the dead flowers off my annuals. Then, I pooper scoop the
yard. I’d like Judge Scalia to read that homosexual agenda from the bench.
People are finding out that just like the masses at straight bars and
Superbowl parties, gay people actually leave the dance floor or festival and
go back to their desks at major corporations, government jobs, local police
forces (mostly the girls, thank you) and other worthwhile pursuits.
And they go back there buck naked in the legal protection department.
This summer, two of my long-time friends are courageously taking on the
board of directors of one of this country’s largest non-profit
organizations. One of the men, a respected physician has worked for the
organization for eons. He’s also undergoing cancer treatment. Should
something tragic happen, his partner of 26 years has absolutely no standing
with respect to the doctor’s well-earned pension. As they fight for
domestic partner benefits, suddenly the organization has a familiar face to
go with the facts. We hope our friends’ efforts prove victorious by summer’s
end. If so, it will make the papers.
Domestic partnerships, civil unions, gay marriage, whatever you call it,
it’s about equality.
I’d settle for being called a domestic partner (although that smacks of
two women joined in holy Hazel’s cleaning service) or having a civil union
(sounds so polite, but emotionless) instead of a marriage as long as we
achieve equality.
But frankly, dubbing it marriage is the easy way out. There would be only
one standard. Equality. Otherwise, this nation could get caught up in
conflicting civil union and domestic partner laws until Richard Chamberlain
comes out of the closet….oh, he did.
Frankly, I think same-sex marriage is a very conservative idea. For years
our enemies have blasted the "gay lifestyle" for its members’
inability to form lasting relationships. That’s pretty strange when you
realize that it’s these same ranters who’ve denied us the right to have
our relationships sanctioned in the first place. Fooled them, too. Like many
places in the country, Rehoboth Beach, is overflowing with gay couples in
20, 30 and 40-year relationships. Two couples I know have had golden
anniversaries.
Many commentators seem to agree with me and are starting to see gay
nuptials as a conservative notion. If gays could marry, that ugly phrase
"special rights" would be obsolete. We’d have equal rights. Ba
da bing.
But the best thing that gay marriage has going for it is its patriotism.
Gay marriage would be a huge economic boon for this country. It would lift
our economy from it’s current sorry state like a Cosmopolitan lifts my
mood on Friday night.
Eureka! Why haven’t Republican strategists thought of this! I hate to
admit it, but George W. Bush could actually save our economy (and his job)
just by getting Congress to legalize same-sex marriage.
Imagine how many men would register at Crate and Barrel? The economic
spike from thousands of added wedding receptions in a single year would
cause runaway spending.
Think of the tuxedo rentals. And the guys would buy clothes, too. Then
there’d be lavish receptions all over the country—especially in gay
resort towns. This could be awesome for Rehoboth hotels and B&B’s.
Money would flow into the local economy for wedding planners, DJs, caterers,
airline tickets, limos, booze, bands and bird seed. Florists and
hairdressers could pamper their own for a change.
The stock market would soar to new heights on growth from hospitality and
travel stocks. Photographers and organ players would feel the demand and
governments would reap increased marriage license revenue. Fire halls would
be fully booked and bride and bride and groom and groom cake toppers would
fly off store shelves.
Frankly, fundamentalist church attendance could go up as well.
Congregants would trip all over themselves to pray for the souls of the
hundreds or thousands, no, millions of people benefiting from this simple
concept of equal rights.
This is such a great election strategy that I can’t imagine President
Bush and his re-election team passing it up. After all, everybody knows it’s
the economy, stupid. What are you waiting for?
Now I have to find out if Home Depot has a bridal registry.
Fay Jacobs may be reached at