Homosexuality in the World Religions: Part 4 of a Series
"Hinduism," the term used by Western students of religion for
the traditional religion of India, is really not one faith but many. Thus,
it is not surprising that there is no one attitude or text regarding
homosexual relations in Hinduism. In general, Hinduism is possibly the
most sex-positive religion in the world. One of the reasons for the
splitting off of Buddhism and Jainism from Hinduism was that both valued
asceticism and celibacy, which their founders did not believe Hinduism
afforded. In India, the literature of sex is believed to be of divine
origin, creation itself having resulted from divine sexual arousal:
"In the beginning there was desire, which was the primal germ of the
mind" (Rg Veda, X, 129). On the Indian subcontinent almost all forms
of sexual behavior were practiced or encouraged by one sect or another,
due to the predominant belief that all desire was holy if the mind was
pure.
According to the first Upanishad (another scripture of Hinduism), sex
is ritual and ceremonial. The Indians regarded the male semen as having
mystical powers, and certain texts directed how spilled semen was to be
cleaned up so as not to be wasted. Swallowing of semen (but not the act of
fellatio itself) was strictly forbidden. A method of coitus reservatus,
whereby the urethra was pressed at orgasm so that the semen would not be
expelled, was counseled due to the belief that it was sacred fluid and
should therefore remain in the body unless one was seeking conception.
Thus, one finds that, unlike Judeo-Christianity, traditional Indian
religion did not believe that sexual activity was for procreation only.
This would therefore open the way for a more accepting view of
homosexuality, which is demonstrated in the following attitude toward anal
intercourse: The anus is one of the most important chakras in the body,
the source of artistic, poetic, and mystical faculties; therefore, anal
intercourse is seen as a way of stimulating that chakra. This attitude is
not the only one to be found, however. There is ambivalence among certain
Hindu sects; for example, followers of Manu said that men who engaged in
anal intercourse with other men were reborn unable to procreate. It is
reported that lesbianism was punished (probably because it did not involve
the sacred semen) and that during certain periods male homosexual acts
required some sort of cleansing bath. In interpretations of mythological
tales, "intercourse" between females is said to result in a
child which will lack bones and just be a ball of flesh.
Certain motifs in Hindu mythology, while not involving homosexual acts
per se, nevertheless do involve issues that are tangential to discussions
of homoeroticism. For example, androgyny, an actual change of physical
gender, and masquerading as the opposite gender are characteristics of the
god Shiva found in Indian literature. Shiva’s "ambiguous
sexuality" first appears in the Mahabharata (another sacred text),
ca. 300 b.c.e. Hindu ritual was filled with eroticism, and one obvious way
for the male worshiper to visualize an erotic relationship with a male god
would be through homosexual imagery. Additionally, one finds male gods
such as Vishnu serially transforming themselves into women and having sex
with male humans. Clearly, the nature of gender is much more fluid in the
East than in the West!
Hinduism has also recognized a form of sacred prostitution, whereby a
male could have a sexual encounter with a female temple attendant in order
to make a connection with a male god. However, a far more widespread
phenomenon is the religious coupling with "boy" prostitutes and
those who are considered "third sex" or "female men"
(a phenomenon also found in indigenous religions), the most common
examples of which are the hijra and the kliba. Hijras are males and
physically indeterminate individuals in present-day Pakistan and northern
India who worship a mother goddess figure and live together in
collectives. As those who are "between genders," they trace
their origin to the fourth book of the Mahabharata and fulfill a religious
role for many Hindus by calling down the goddess’ blessing upon
newlyweds and newborn males. Some are actually transgendered rather than
homosexual, inasmuch as they practice ritual castration; these are not
regarded as women, however, but as a third gender. Many also engage in
secular prostitution for their livelihood.
The kliba is a different, though possibly related category of
individuals that includes a wide range of meanings under the general
homophobic rubric of "a man who does not act the way a man should
act," a man who fails to "be a man." It is a catchall term
that ancestral Hindu culture coined to indicate those who are in some way
sexually dysfunctional—the sterile, impotent, castrated, transvestites,
hermaphrodites, and those with mutilated or defective organs or who
produce only female children. Hindu scholar Wendy Doniger notes that
"[w]hen a culture does not want to confront an issue, it produces a
haze of obfuscating terms that can be used for a wide range of pejorative
purposes. Cultures are often nervous and vague about extremes of sexuality
and tend to equate them rather than look closely at them. Kliba is such a
term. Thus, though it is often correctly pointed out that Hindus recognize
a third sex, this should not be adduced to imply that Hindus approve of
this third sex or use it to counteract what we think of as
"Western" dualism and homophobia. Hindu ideas about
homosexuality and klibas do not support a gay agenda."
What Doniger says is true. Despite some textual and mythological
openness toward homoeroticism on the one hand, there is still present in
modern India a negativity toward homosexual acts. This may be due to the
British bringing homophobic cultural assumptions with them when they began
to occupy India. Moreover, encounters with Greeks, Muslims, and the
British over time may have persuaded the Indians that
"homosexuality" as a cultural phenomenon was a foreign influence
having nothing at all in common with the homoeroticism in Hindu texts.
Thus, homosexuality has come to be identified increasingly as
characteristic of the dominant, non-Indian minorities and therefore
reprehensible by association; Ghandi himself is said to have denounced
homosexuality as a Western influence. In closing, I would like to made
explicit a characteristic of Hindu attitudes toward same-sex love that
could be inferred from the invisibility of lesbians in my discussion:
Since India has been and continues to be a patriarchal society practicing
male-dominated religion, lesbianism is scarcely a "blip" on
Hindu’s radar-screen. Even though the feminine divine is widely
worshiped, there is still a reliance on traditional, stereotypical
male-female gender roles for human beings, as indicated by the creation of
a "third sex" to account for those who do not fit neatly into
structured gender categories.