Homosexuality in the World Religions: Part 5 of a Series
When one examines homosexuality in Buddhism, the religion founded upon
the spiritual awakening of Siddhartha Gautama ("the Buddha") in
India ca. 540 b.c.e., it is important to realize that there is a
"dearth" of scholarship regarding Buddhism and sexuality.
Gautama, disillusioned with Hinduism, found through meditation that one’s
worldly pain ceases when one is able to overcome earthly cravings through
moral and spiritual discipline. Thus, according to the Buddhist mindset,
the "best" or most successful Buddhist is a celibate monk who is
undistracted by the pleasures of the world or the flesh, hence its
emphasis upon world denial and renunciation. From India, Buddhism spread
into China and Japan; modern Buddhism is primarily descended from the
Buddhisms of Tibet and Japan.
Buddhism is a religion of diversity and adaptability, however, and one
consequently finds different attitudes, customs, and religious practices,
depending upon the culture of the geographical locale. For example, Indian
Buddhism was essentially neutral on the subject of homosexuality; this
basic neutrality was the foundation upon which developed the toleration of
sexual diversity in other Buddhist cultures and the actual extolling of
male love in Buddhist Japan.
Implicit in many of the views against homosexuality expressed in the
other world religions is an underlying sexism and misogyny, which
manifests itself in disdain, hostility, and outright violence against
those who are perceived as acting like women (i.e., male homosexuals) or
subverting gender expectations (i.e., lesbians). In many ways, Buddhism
has avoided this due to its basic teaching that gender, like caste or
class, posed no barrier to religious freedom, which was a revolutionary
soteriological assertion in its historical context. Nevertheless, as
Buddhism adapted itself to the various cultures in which it was situated,
there were varying attitudes of repression and tolerance both of women and
of homosexual activity. Thus, we find the attitude that any sexual
activity that deflects one from a spiritual path is to be avoided but that
heterosexual relations within marriage are permitted due to the need for
procreation. However, one also sees the extolling of same-sex love (as in
Islam), the acceptance of same-sex genital activity, and an ambivalence
toward those who are considered a type of "third sex."
Historically Japan has been the Buddhist environment most accepting of
same-sex relations. Pederastic relations and noble love (shudo or nanshoku)
between an adult male and an adolescent boy flourished in the sixteenth
through the eighteenth centuries of the Common Era under the rule of the
samurai and did not become an object of prohibition until the
modernization and industrialization (i.e., westernization) of Japan in the
nineteenth and twentieth centuries. When the Jesuit missionary Francis
Xavier arrived in Japan in 1549, he was horrified by the widespread
practicing of the "sin abhorred by nature," particularly in the
Buddhist monasteries; religious acceptance of homosexuality was so
established that Lord Yoshitaka cast the Jesuits out of his presence when
they began to preach on "the sin of Sodom." It has been
suggested that the widespread homosexuality among Japanese Buddhist monks
was considered by them a "way out" of the contradiction between
the traditional injunction to celibacy and the avoidance of women and the
Tantric encouragement of sexuality.
Modern Buddhist attitudes toward homosexuality are ambiguous. The Four
Noble Truths and the Middle Way are espoused by the majority of Buddhists
in Mahayana Buddhism, which one may refer to as the "lay"
movement, while Theravada Buddhism is the monastic strand. In examining
these attitudes, one must again divorce oneself from modern western views
of sexual orientation; for example, the Pali canon from Theravada Buddhism
contains references that disapprove of homosexual behavior. However, these
do not match contemporary notions of homosexuality or homosexual people
and must be understood against the general disdain for all sexuality found
in Theravada, which is concerned with clerical celibacy, seeing any sort
of lust as a betrayal of dispassionate equanimity; homosexual and
heterosexual acts are viewed as equally repugnant. Mahayana attitudes
vacillate between the conservative belief that homosexual tendencies
result from a willful sin which can controlled, and the liberal belief
that those who reveal a proclivity for same-sex affinity "can’t
help it" and are paying for something in a past life.
Contemporary Buddhist groups in America have been sporadically
welcoming and rejecting of gay and lesbian adherents. On the one hand,
Buddhism has an attractiveness for gay and lesbian refugees from
Christianity, due to the widespread misapprehension that Buddhism is
silent on the issue of homosexuality, leading to the formation of
exclusively gay/lesbian Buddhist groups. On the other hand, there has been
intolerance from those who have been Buddhist for longer duration, who see
this as a "fad" and a gay/lesbian co-opting of their tradition.
Moreover, there has been recent controversy as to the status of gay and
lesbian people in Buddhism due to remarks made by His Holiness the Dalai
Lama, who stated in an interview that sexual acts involving the mouth and
the anus as well as masturbation are examples of sexual misconduct for
Buddhists. His Holiness has since added that even though he stands by his
statements, to persecute or discriminate against any person is
antithetical to the spirit of Buddhism.
For Further Reading:
• Jose Ignacio Cabezon, ed., Buddhism, Sexuality, and Gender (State
University of New York Press, 1992)
• Bernard Faure, The Red Thread: Buddhist Approaches to Sexuality
(Princeton University Press, 1998)
• Winston Leyland, ed., Queer Dharma: Voices of Gay Buddhism (Gay
Sunshine Press, 1998)
The Rev. Tom Bohache, Pastor of Metropolitan Community Church of
Rehoboth, is a speaker, teacher, and writer on the intersection of
sexuality and spirituality. E-mail him at